02.22.09

Comparing Your Professor With a Satanist

Posted in Culture, Philosophy and Theology, Science, postmodern tagged , , , , , , , , , at 11:14 pm by breadandsham

Empiricists and Rationalists Are More Superstitious Than I Am


The basic tenant of humanism is the same as the basic tenant of Satanism-it puts man in the center.  Man decides what is good, what is best for himself, what matters, what works, and what he wants.  Man is the final rule and authority over himself.  He is the existential norm, the ethical norm, and the starting point for all knowledge of himself and his world.

Scientific Positivism/Empiricism:

In many ways, any attempt by modern man to define intellectual truth as a case against religion has only resulted in producing another religion–a religion of science, nature, and experimentation.  Any attempt to define God in empirical terms has produced in his place a religion of experience.  The object of worship becomes the creation and not the Originator or First Cause that created it.  “Scientific faith” is centered on the experimental and experiencing self first and the object of that exam, second.  Faith in experience alone is more superstitious and deceitful than acknowledging the thing that created the experience.

An empiricist cannot speak about the nature of God because the nature of God is hidden from human experience until one admits that he cannot trust his experiences alone (or exclusively) to be valid.  That individual is worse than the man with a brain tumor telling the surgeon how to kill the tumor.  He is a man who pretends that there is no such thing as a tumor in his brain because he cannot find the cause of it.

Rationalism:

A religion of rationalism can offer a great deal to our understanding of metaphysics, but only after it is submitted to He who makes reason reasonable.  Whether or not a God exists is above reason-it is the place where reason starts-it is the norm that makes reason possible. This human-first thinking is not submitted to an absolute, but an autonomous and subjective thinking individual.  This is more than irrational, it is the most arrogant position a mortal can take on metaphysics.

For a Cartesian, not only is the passenger telling the pilot how to fly the plane, he is pretending that he himself is that pilot.  “Nothing exists unless I can know it logically” + “I only know myself,” therefore, “I alone can fly this plane.” (also autonomy).

1) I am free, powerful, and limitless, and I did it all by myself. 2) Because I am free, I can go wherever I wish.

Satanism:

Most modernists don’t know that their faith is in line with Satanism. Satanism does not substitute the worship of God for that of Satan-only that of the self.  Satanism and modernism are synonymous.  From Wiki:

LaVeyan Satanism is a religion founded in 1966 by Anton Szandor LaVey. Its teachings are based on individualism, self-indulgence, and “eye for an eye” morality. Unlike Theistic Satanists, LaVeyan Satanists are atheists and agnostics who regard Satan as a symbol of man’s inherent nature. According to religioustolerance.org, LaVeyan Satanism is a “small religious group that is unrelated to any other faith, and whose members feel free to satisfy their urges responsibly, exhibit kindness to their friends, and attack their enemies”. Its beliefs were first detailed in The Satanic Bible and it is overseen by the Church of Satan.

Essentially, the modernist mind says this: Although I am in no way responsible for where I came from, nor am I able to contribute to my improvement, I will not submit to any power outside of the thinking and feeling self. Although there is order which implies meaning, and meaning implies ethics, and ethics implies accountability to something outside myself, I am going to pretend that none of this is true. Instead, I am not accountable to anyone or anything other than myself. I will do that which I believe is right to me. It is my self-religion.

02.12.09

The New Slavery (What is worship? Pt. II)

Posted in Culture, Philosophy and Theology, postmodern tagged , , , , , , , , , at 1:52 pm by breadandsham


We have moved from bondage to bondage.

As a church, we see how Israel has moved from bondage to Pharaoh, to bondage to Yahweh.

For example, “Fear the LORD. And now, O Israel, what does the LORD your God ask of you but to fear the LORD your God, to walk in all his ways, to love him, to serve the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul, and to observe the LORD’s commands and decrees that I am giving you today for your own good? (Deut. 10:12-13)

As a New Testament church, Paul says that we were once slaves to sin, but now, we are slaves to righteousness. He refers to himself as a bond servant.

Similarly, when it comes to the study of knowledge (epistemology), we affirm that there are those of us who are in bondage to knowledge of the flesh. There are others whose thoughts are in service to the knowledge of the Holy. It’s a puppet show.

The irony here, is that the truth sets us free. (John 8:32) We are never free, however, until we recognize that our knowledge is in bonded servitude to the knowledge of Christ. Peter was asked by Jesus, “Who do you say I am?” His answer was the starting point for all knowledge; that of the world, others, and ourselves. It all starts with a knowledge of God and who He is.

Don’t you know that when you offer yourselves to someone to obey him as slaves, you are slaves to the one whom you obey—whether you are slaves to sin, which leads to death, or to obedience, which leads to righteousness? But thanks be to God that, though you used to be slaves to sin, you wholeheartedly obeyed the form of teaching to which you were entrusted. You have been set free from sin and have become slaves to righteousness (Romans 6:15f).

Self-Sacrifice: What is Worship pt. I

02.08.09

Water = Chaos or Peace (Pt. II)

Posted in Philosophy and Theology tagged , , , , , , , , , , , at 3:12 am by breadandsham

Water = Chaos (Introducing the Egyptian chaos god of Nun)

In Egyptian culture, the same culture from which Israel had spent 430 yrs., they believed that before the world was formed, there was a watery mass of dark, directionless chaos. In this chaos lived the Ogdoad of Khmunu (Hermopolis), four frog gods and four snake goddesses of chaos. These deities were Nun and Naunet (water).  The name of the water of chaos was Nun.  The gods were being threatened and created the world out of necessity.  They were also in struggle with other gods and created the race of mankind out of necessity.

Conclusion: any deity outside of the God of Israel is in contention and struggle with the cosmos and other gods.  There is a tempest that is out of their god’s sovereign control.  Pagan gods are not present in their world with all control and authority.

In contrast, Paul says this about Christ as God: Read the rest of this entry »

Water = Life or Death (This post is not suitable for self-righteous believers or Roman Catholics)

Posted in Philosophy and Theology tagged , , , , , , , , , , , at 3:07 am by breadandsham

stormy_sea

What?

Would you even dare read a post with such a bizarre title?  I hope to be brief so as to keep your attention.  I think that the theological implications of water are amazing.  The word “water” as it appears in Scripture or other ancient literature is absolutely loaded with theological and sociological meaning.  Neither you or I have the time for me to be comprehensive about it.  I will be brief, however, if you have questions or comments about my conclusions, be free to ask.  The goal of this post is to introduce the concept, or to remind those who have forgotten, that everything in Scripture has meaning, every verse has significance, and the reality of this is what builds faith.  Deep thinking about the Word of God does not chase away spiritual zeal, it fuels it.  A missional heart comes from hearing biblical theology. Read the rest of this entry »